Today I heard on news developments of radio, the press release related to the warning which makes the defense of Porfirio Pérez Paniagua, former Director of the National Civilian Police, PNC, charged with various offenses related to a " lie "of drugs and the alleged disappearance of about 300 thousand dollars to attend the Interamerican Court of Human Rights, IACHR, if the Attorney General, MP, appealed the sentences in which he was acquitted because the judge of first instance, to evaluating the evidence, not considered sufficient to convict him.
This case has many sides from which to analyze, but we'll leave to future opportunity. I want no part of the case that some lawyers often do in the media, and this space is public, but it is difficult not to speak when the folly and lack of common sense some fellow lawyers reaches the end of appeasement.
turns out that the defense of the accused, despite all the elements that have been public through the press, which we assume were part of the evidence in court against him, the court system does not condemn his client, now leaves us with who does not believe the courts have ruled in his favor, and threatens to "the mat of dead" of the Commission, as members of that High Court, who traditionally love to intervene in domestic affairs, did not have at least a bit of seriousness and professionalism.
Is not the MP in his right to appeal any sentence in court proceedings in which a party? Is it not also a duty to appeal the sentence?
I'm pretty careful, for the moment, of prejudging the defendant's innocence or not, but condemn the despicable attitude of the legal professional that does not give place to the domestic courts are favoring him.
With attitudes like that, let us not complain after that comes the OAS or any proconsular aires ambassador to dictate what to do.
Shame!
0 comments:
Post a Comment